<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AskDba.org Weblog &#187; Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://askdba.org/weblog/tag/performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://askdba.org/weblog</link>
	<description>Writing About Our Experiences With Oracle Databases</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 05:02:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Poll on Sql Plan Management</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/05/poll-on-sql-plan-management/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/05/poll-on-sql-plan-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11gR2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/05/poll-on-sql-plan-management/">Poll on Sql Plan Management</a></p><p>Dominic is conducting poll on SPM and Sql Profiles usage on his website. Link can be found here  I have been using SPM and SQL Profiles (using coe_xfr_profile.sql) to fix plans for queries  and believe me its very easy and quick way of fixing problems in production database. I have not yet used SPM to [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/05/poll-on-sql-plan-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimizer Choosing Nested-Loop Joins Instead of Hash-Joins</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/01/optimizer-choosing-nested-loop-joins-instead-of-hash-joins/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/01/optimizer-choosing-nested-loop-joins-instead-of-hash-joins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle 10g]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/01/optimizer-choosing-nested-loop-joins-instead-of-hash-joins/">Optimizer Choosing Nested-Loop Joins Instead of Hash-Joins</a></p><p>In one of my databases, one application query suddenly started to pick Nested-Loop joins instead of Hash-Joins and took almost 6 hours to complete which gets completed in less than 10 secs with Hash-Joins. The same query in another similar database with same configuration and same data is doing fine and using hash joins. There is [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/01/optimizer-choosing-nested-loop-joins-instead-of-hash-joins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>User Sessions stuck on resmgr:cpu quantum wait event</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/01/user-sessions-stuck-on-resmgrcpu-quantum-wait-event/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/01/user-sessions-stuck-on-resmgrcpu-quantum-wait-event/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dbms_scheduler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/01/user-sessions-stuck-on-resmgrcpu-quantum-wait-event/">User Sessions stuck on resmgr:cpu quantum wait event</a></p><p>We were experiencing lot of session getting stuck on resmgr:cpu quantum in our database. In fact at a time we had 70 sessions which were stuck on this wait event and our cpu load average was touching 60 Checking active resource plan, we found that DEFAULT_MAINTENANCE_PLAN was active. As per 11g Docs In this plan, [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2012/01/user-sessions-stuck-on-resmgrcpu-quantum-wait-event/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plan Stability using Sql Profiles and SQL Plan Management</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/12/plan-stability-using-sql-profiles-and-sql-plan-management/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/12/plan-stability-using-sql-profiles-and-sql-plan-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dbms_spm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dbms_sqltune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/12/plan-stability-using-sql-profiles-and-sql-plan-management/">Plan Stability using Sql Profiles and SQL Plan Management</a></p><p>PLAN STABILITY How many times you have noticed a query using Index X when you wanted it to use index Y or query performing Nested Loop join when Hash Join would have completed the query much faster.Or take a scenario when the application suddenly starts using wrong plan after database restart. To solve all these [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/12/plan-stability-using-sql-profiles-and-sql-plan-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR in 11.2.0.2</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/12/sql_shared_cursor-in-11-2-0-2/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/12/sql_shared_cursor-in-11-2-0-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11.2.0.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/12/sql_shared_cursor-in-11-2-0-2/">V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR in 11.2.0.2</a></p><p>Oracle 11.2.0.2 has introduced new column &#8220;REASON&#8221; to V$SQL_SHARED_CURSORS. I came across this extremely useful column while debugging multiple child cursor issue (11.2.0.2 seems to have too many bugs which can cause multiple child cursors). As per documentation , REASON column has been introduced in 11.2.0.2 REASON - CLOB Child number, id, and reason the [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/12/sql_shared_cursor-in-11-2-0-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle Database Appliance Introduced</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/09/oracle-database-appliance-introduced/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/09/oracle-database-appliance-introduced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 04:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11gR2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/09/oracle-database-appliance-introduced/">Oracle Database Appliance Introduced</a></p><p>Oracle has introduced it new product: ODA (Oracle Database Appliance) I was not able to join Oracle President Mark Hurd&#8217;s webcast where he supposed to announce a new Oracle product[It was at 1AM my time and I was sleeping], now viewing this webcast HERE Kerry Osborne has shared information about this product, click link to [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/09/oracle-database-appliance-introduced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Performance Management Guide on AIX</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/02/performance-management-guide-on-aix/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/02/performance-management-guide-on-aix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/02/performance-management-guide-on-aix/">Performance Management Guide on AIX</a></p><p>While trying to find the amount of physical memory used by oracle process on AIX, I got reference of a document from Metalink: Performance Management Guide It tell us about which process is using how much memory and how to interpret the output of commands like: vmstat, svmon, ps on AIX. Also, to get more [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2011/02/performance-management-guide-on-aix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ORA-01722 with Full Table Scan</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2010/12/ora-01722-with-full-table-scan/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2010/12/ora-01722-with-full-table-scan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full table scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2010/12/ora-01722-with-full-table-scan/">ORA-01722 with Full Table Scan</a></p><p>My application developers approached me with an issue which is very unique to me. They were complaining about a query which was failing with ORA-01722 &#8220;invalid number&#8221; after an upgrade to 11.1.0.7 from 10.2.0.4. The syntax of the query is like: select max(a) from t1 where c1&#60;&#62;&#039;abc&#039; and c2=12345 and c3=&#039;Y&#039; and c4=&#039;xyz&#039;; This query [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2010/12/ora-01722-with-full-table-scan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2010 Blogroll Report</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2010/10/october-2010-blogroll-report/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2010/10/october-2010-blogroll-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11gR2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogreport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[log_buffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2010/10/october-2010-blogroll-report/">October 2010 Blogroll Report</a></p><p>It&#8217;s been time since we saw log-buffer edition with last being published on 1st October 2010 and  Coskan&#8217;s weekly blogroll report I found them really useful to read top blog articles for week. So I decided to tag few articles posted in October 2010 which I  had read and found useful. I am subscribed to [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2010/10/october-2010-blogroll-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sqlplus connection on AIX taking too long</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/09/sqlplus-connection-on-aix-taking-too-long/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/09/sqlplus-connection-on-aix-taking-too-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/09/sqlplus-connection-on-aix-taking-too-long/">Sqlplus connection on AIX taking too long</a></p><p>Recently we faced a performance issue, where in sqlplus connection from application server A (AIX 5.3) to Database server DB (different physical server,10gR2 on AIX 5.3) was taking nearly 1-2 minutes.  We did some quick check&#8217;s to narrow down the problematic area.i.e Is it network or database server or some issue with application server? 1)Vmstat [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/09/sqlplus-connection-on-aix-taking-too-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GATHER_STATS_JOB &#8211; Is it enabled?</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/08/gather_stats_job-is-it-enabled/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/08/gather_stats_job-is-it-enabled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dbms_stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/08/gather_stats_job-is-it-enabled/">GATHER_STATS_JOB &#8211; Is it enabled?</a></p><p>Few days back , Martin had posted a series of post on a issue where GATHER_STATS_JOB was failing silently for a large object. If you have missed it, you can check following links Automated statistics gathering silently fails http://mwidlake.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/automated-statistics-gathering-silently-fails/ Automated Statistics Gathering Silently Fails #2 http://mwidlake.wordpress.com/2009/07/23/automated-statistics-gathering-silently-fails-2/ Automatic Statistics Gathering Fails #3   http://mwidlake.wordpress.com/2009/07/29/automatic-statistics-gathering-fails-3/ Automated statistics [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/08/gather_stats_job-is-it-enabled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mview Complete Refresh and Atomic_refresh parameter</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/07/mview-complete-refresh-and-atomic_refresh-parameter/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/07/mview-complete-refresh-and-atomic_refresh-parameter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/07/mview-complete-refresh-and-atomic_refresh-parameter/">Mview Complete Refresh and Atomic_refresh parameter</a></p><p>This post discusses issue faced by me while working on Materialized view (mview) creation at new site(database). Starting Oracle 10g, how atomic_refresh works with complete refresh has undergone a change. Atomic_refresh parameter is to allow either all of the tasks of a transaction are performed or none of them (Atomicity). If set to TRUE, then [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/07/mview-complete-refresh-and-atomic_refresh-parameter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>dbms_stats.copy_table_stats does not alter low/high value</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/06/dbms_stats-copy_table_stats-does-not-alter-lowhigh-value/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/06/dbms_stats-copy_table_stats-does-not-alter-lowhigh-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10.2.0.4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11.1.0.7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dbms_stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partitioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/06/dbms_stats-copy_table_stats-does-not-alter-lowhigh-value/">dbms_stats.copy_table_stats does not alter low/high value</a></p><p>I was working on a performance issue arising due to missing table stats on a new partition for large Partitioned table.This was a 10.2.0.4 database on IBM AIX 5L. So as to resolve the issue , I used dbms_stats.copy_table_stats to copy the stats to new parition from the previous partition. EXEC DBMS_STATS.COPY_TABLE_STATS (&#8216;owner&#8217;, &#8216;tabname&#8217;, &#8216;SourcePart&#8217;, [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/06/dbms_stats-copy_table_stats-does-not-alter-lowhigh-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Don&#8217;t need SysDBA privilege to run Awrrpt..</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/05/you-dont-need-sysdba-privilege-to-run-awrrpt/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/05/you-dont-need-sysdba-privilege-to-run-awrrpt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/05/you-dont-need-sysdba-privilege-to-run-awrrpt/">You Don&#8217;t need SysDBA privilege to run Awrrpt..</a></p><p>Well I tried to Sensationalize this post by using such a heading Though I just wanted to point out that Awrrpt script can be run without sysdba privilege too. Actually if you open awrrpti.sql script , it contains following line Rem NOTES Rem Run as SYSDBA. Generally this script should be invoked by awrrpt, Rem [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/05/you-dont-need-sysdba-privilege-to-run-awrrpt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connections to DataBase Hang Including &#8220;/ as sysdba&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/04/connections-to-database-hang-including-as-sysdba/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/04/connections-to-database-hang-including-as-sysdba/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle 10g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/04/connections-to-database-hang-including-as-sysdba/">Connections to DataBase Hang Including &#8220;/ as sysdba&#8221;</a></p><p>Recently I faced one issue where all the connection to database hung and it was also not possible to login to database using &#8220;/ as sysdba&#8221;. To get access of sqlplus I used the following syntax: $ sqlplus -prelim / as sysdba With &#8220;prelim&#8221; option we can run some commands which will help in collection [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2009/04/connections-to-database-hang-including-as-sysdba/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Index Access best approach?? Not Always&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/12/index-access-best-approach-not-always/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/12/index-access-best-approach-not-always/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan_table]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askdba.org/weblog/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/12/index-access-best-approach-not-always/">Index Access best approach?? Not Always&#8230;</a></p><p>There is a common misconception that Index access is the best access method for query execution. This approach leads to people concentrate on removing Full Table Scans (FTS) from the Query execution plan. I recently worked on a performance tuning issue where I found such scenario. Basically customer was trying to generate report for 3 [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/12/index-access-best-approach-not-always/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resolving Shutdown Immediate Hang Situations</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/05/shutdown-immediate-hang-2/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/05/shutdown-immediate-hang-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askoracledba.wordpress.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/05/shutdown-immediate-hang-2/">Resolving Shutdown Immediate Hang Situations</a></p><p>Many times Oracle DBA&#8217;s are faced with a situation where shutting down the instance with shutdown immediate seems to take infinite time and gives a impression that the session is hung. In most of the cases this is not a hang. Hang can be defined as a scenario when few sessions/processes are waiting on some [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/05/shutdown-immediate-hang-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracing Sessions with Event 10046</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/05/tracing-sessions-with-event-10046/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/05/tracing-sessions-with-event-10046/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askoracledba.wordpress.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/05/tracing-sessions-with-event-10046/">Tracing Sessions with Event 10046</a></p><p>10046 Event is used to trace SQL statements (similar to sql_trace=true) with additional details depending on the tracing level which is specified. 10046 EVENT levels: 1 &#8211; Enable standard SQL_TRACE functionality (Default) 4 &#8211; As Level 1 PLUS trace bind values 8 &#8211; As Level 1 PLUS trace waits 12 &#8211; As Level 1 PLUS [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/05/tracing-sessions-with-event-10046/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sign on Letter to Larry Ellison on AWR and ASH Licensing</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/03/sign-on-letter-to-larry-ellison-on-awr-and-ash-licensing/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/03/sign-on-letter-to-larry-ellison-on-awr-and-ash-licensing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askoracledba.wordpress.com/2008/03/29/sign-on-letter-to-larry-ellison-on-awr-and-ash-licensing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/03/sign-on-letter-to-larry-ellison-on-awr-and-ash-licensing/">Sign on Letter to Larry Ellison on AWR and ASH Licensing</a></p><p>While surfing across the blog&#8217;s, I found this particular link, a compaign which is aimed at getting free access to the ASH and AWR reports. I believe most of us know that we need to pay extra fees for the Diagnostic Tuning Pack which also includes ASH and AWR report. (If you’re not already familiar [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/03/sign-on-letter-to-larry-ellison-on-awr-and-ash-licensing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HW enqueue contention with LOB</title>
		<link>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/03/hw-enqueue-contention-with-lob/</link>
		<comments>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/03/hw-enqueue-contention-with-lob/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askoracledba.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/hw-enqueue-contention-with-lob/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p>Original Post can be viewed at <a href="http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/03/hw-enqueue-contention-with-lob/">HW enqueue contention with LOB</a></p><p>DefinitionEnqueues are local locks that serialize access to various resources. Enqueue wait event indicates a wait for a lock that is held by another session (or sessions) in an incompatible mode to the requested mode. HW Enqueue &#8211; High Watermark enqueue is acquired when a segment&#8217;s high water mark is moved, which will normally happen [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://askdba.org/weblog">AskDba.org Weblog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askdba.org/weblog/2008/03/hw-enqueue-contention-with-lob/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: askdba.org @ 2012-05-22 18:58:04 by W3 Total Cache -->
